Problems encountered in the implementation of the literary works review and how to solve them

In this article, postgraduate pupils can learn about the difficulties experienced into the utilization of the literary works review and methods to solve them.

Not enough literary works on the subject

When looking both domestic and literature that is foreign pay attention to the search words employed by you: issues with the search for literary works are due to the usage wrong terms.

For several systematic areas, domestic researchers have inked significantly less research than foreign people. Therefore, when you yourself have not found domestic literature about the subject, maybe you are able to discover international literary works. To begin with, you ought to rely on the Medline database.

You need to adjust the plan of the defense based on real possibilities if you still can not find literature on your topic. In addition, the present situation should be reported to your systematic leader on time. In medical works, as an example, you are able to upload materials on epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, clinic, treatment and diagnosis types of the studied illness, along with historical reference.

In the event that review is specialized in the scholarly research associated with the effectiveness associated with the treatment method, it’s possible to describe:

  • its history,
  • apparatus of action,
  • its application and its particular effectiveness in several fields of medicine;
  • description of alternative therapies with an increased exposure of their effectiveness that is insufficient of application, unwanted effects, etc.

To be able to prevent this case, it is strongly recommended that in the phase of collection of literary works, select all materials that could be of good use.

Insufficient number of the review

There are numerous approaches to raise the scope for the study:

  • replace the wording by entering phrases that are additional sentences. Slight upsurge in amount.
  • include additional products – the essential radical method. You could add not containing information that is important but big by amount of information – a historic reference, the etiology associated with infection. Often such information, not holding a semantic load, is a description for the pathogenesis for the infection.
  • in the event that sources are presented in the shape of figures – replace them by „last name + year”, while incorporating a few names to the mention of one source. Allows you to increase the volume to 5 pages.

Insufficient wide range of types of literary works

Most frequently there was a number that is insufficient of sources. This dilemma is fixed very easily – by searching the literary works into the electronic catalogs associated with CB and also the PubMed database.

The full total wide range of sources may be increased because of the introduction of paragraphs, containing a lot of links and extra background information, as an example:

Many reports of domestic (…) and international (…) scientists have already been specialized in the research of this dilemmas of treatment of illness X.

Presence of old sources into the review can be a negative characteristic. The search within the PubMed database permits not just to find interesting informative data on this issue, but additionally represents the way that is simplest to fix the situation associated with lack of references in the past few years.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

© 2011 Loreto Exim srl Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha